Staying with British made pencils for my second part of pencils for Calligraphy / lettering, we have the William Mitchell’s “Monk” pencil.
Similar to the Druid in naming, it appears that that both manufacturers were trying to evoke the same ideas with their marketing.
My box came a bit battered, however, with a little glue here and there, I managed to resurrect it into something a bit more presentable. The base of the box has a slight step halfway up which allows the lid to sit flush when closed. The inside of the lid features the same graphics as the outside. Perhaps they hoped you would display these on your desk?
The pencils are a standard carpenter size, unlike the Druid pencils discussed in part 1 and come in a box of 12, pre-sharpened.
I don’t know an enormous amount about William Mitchell, but I have seen plenty of nibs and other art supplies with the name. The rear of the pencils I have says ‘Dryad Handicrafts P224’, a large seller of all sorts of craft goods and formed during WWI (by the excellently named Harry Hardy Peach). The pencils also state ‘No. 228 soft’. I wonder if they actually made any other grades.
There is no maker’s info on the pencils I have, however I have seen other examples showing that they were made by Cumberland (which all makes sense, as i discuss later).
The core shape is quite standard for a carpenter pencil, nothing overly special to see here. The graphite has taken on a slight white look. I’ve seen this on other vintage pencils and it doesn’t appear to affect the usage (it’s only the top layer and wears away quickly anyway). The core looks a little more ragged than the sharp lines of the Druid pencil; maybe tolerances weren’t quite as good?
I tracked down the marketing material for these pencils on eBay but forgot to bid so missed out. The seller was kind enough to send me some pictures of the leaflet anyway. I really like the front cover design and flyer (above).
The information booklet notes that the pencils are made of Red Cedar (instead of Incense Cedar), which is a hint towards their age. Supposedly the core is specifically selected after ‘exhaustive tests’. Time will tell in that regard if there is any special sauce going on here.
We can see from the advertising that William Mitchell falls under the ‘British Pens Ltd’ brand. This would date the pencils as post-1920. Further, British Pens acquired Cumberland in 1921, which would explain why William Mitchell chose them as the manufacturer. I can’t be sure they didn’t continue using the name but Cumberland started using the ‘Derwent’ naming from 1938. I think that the London address for British Pens Limited was bombed during the War, so the street no longer exists properly. Therefore i’d age these pencils from between 1922 and 1937.
That’s everything for part 2. Writing tests to follow, after a few more examples.